maxxis forekaster vs ardent

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community. It was also a Maxx Terra while the 29er was a Maxx Speed, and I couldn't tell any difference in performance between the two. When that tire loses cornering traction, it loses it right away and does not hook back up easily. Two thumbs up. Rolling downhill or on a straightaway, youll notice that its a very efficient design, cutting your effort and letting you rest up for the next uphill slope on your trail. Bike Check: Cal Poly Students' Handmade All-Mountain Tandem - Sea Otter 2023, www.transylvaniatimes.com/lifestyles/popular-pnf-trail-receiving-needed-reroute/article_aff86265-21bb-5c1b-85f6-833d5944b1fa.html, www.amazon.com/Natrapel-Mosquito-Insect-Repellent-Individually-Wrapped/dp/B001ARBSTO. The tread pattern is pretty unique. The EXO construction is well worth the slight weight penalty and is easily offset by not having to carry tubes. If we rode great dirt conditions all the time, we wouldn't hesitate to mount this tire up on the front, rear, or both ends of our efficient mid-travel mountain bikes. When it comes to Maxxis' treads, people tend to gravitate to the established gravity-meats (i.e., the Minion or High Roller series) or the pinner XC treads, such as the Ikon. . I'm not sure it's 'that' much slower than the Minion SS. New Maxxis Forekaster: goodbye to damp, hello to downcountry? Thats why you go 2.6 if you have the room. Thanks. However, the narrow casing and lack of tubeless options were lackluster at best. Singletracks Merch | Manage Settings Search the forum using the power of Google. The previous tire in 292.35 size was quoted at 745g. The Forekaster is also slightly more prone to drifting, especially mounted as the rear tire, or with a cyclist who tends to use the rear brake heavily. Normally the rule of thumb is to have the tire with more grip up front and if one tire size is bigger normally the bigger tire goes up front ("BMX style"). As you would expect, with more tread comes more weight. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Center and intermediate treat designs offer moderately good breaking traction, with performance thats neither the best nor the worst in Maxxis line. I'm a big fan of Maxxis and find all their tires to be reliable. There are intermediate knobs but spaced out quite a bit more than the other tread, leaving a gap where there isn't an intermediate knob. Let's start with the Maxxis Aspen Tires. However, the large outer tread still performs just as well with moderate and even severe pitting, and the rubber doesnt lose reactivity or traction with wear and tear. I have run the forecaster in front, but only as an XC tire for xc marathon races. The Forekaster is Maxxis's closest to the Nic- it's tougher, and heavier, but very similiar. As an all-weather, all-rounder, we rate the Ardents very highly. Part of why they still have it in their line up is that it's popular as OE (cost reasons I guess). ADVANTAGE: MAXXIS, BY A MILE. The Aspen also clears mud very well and while it might not have the overall height of some mud tires, the spaced-out tread allows more clearing when the dirt gets thick. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. That being said, the Ardent tests well as both a front-mounted tire and a rear-mounted tire. Continue with Recommended Cookies. The Aspen recently got a bit of a revamp with a wider casing option, 29 x 2.25. Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire - Singletracks Mountain Bike News Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire Mountain bike trails & Mountain bike reviews Protected: Forums Mountain Bike Forum Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire Viewing 9 reply threads Author Posts June 1, 2019 at 19:52 #263456 pauldominy The Forekaster weighs only 735g with dual compound and EXO sidewall protection. VerticalScope Inc., 111 Peter Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. On my XC hardtail I've used Ardent Race (The race is a totally different tire)and Icon and Forkaster 2.6 front 2.35 rear. As a do it all tire, you cant expect the Ardent to be a perfect performer, but its well suited to moderately aggressive cyclists who dont mind checking trail conditions before they head out for a ride. Maxxis' extensive line of mountain bike tires ensure the perfect tread pattern, compound, and casing option for any trail imaginable. While true cross country racers will be looking for the best weight and rolling speed they can get, our tire choices tend to also have a heavy emphasis on traction. They use a 120tpi casing and are Tubeless Ready - with the option for EXO sidewall reinforcing. Theres also very little tuck under risk with the Forekaster, even with the most aggressive out of saddle pedaling, challenging terrain, or now. Its no longer a XC tyre for damp conditions. The transition nobs do their job translating to a predictable feel. No longer marketed as only a wet weather option for the XC world, Maxxis all-new tire takes aim at the quickly growing world of aggressive XC & Trail. The Maxxis Forekaster used to sit squarely in the aggressive cross-country category, a tire with enough tread for slipperier conditions, but with a fairly low weight. USD Enter the Forekaster 29x2.35 Maxxis's unapologetic copy of the Schwalbe Nobby Nic. Calling it a "Goldilocks" tire, Maxxis envisions the new Forekaster as the ideal step between their current XC options and more aggressive trail and enduro tires. While the Maxxis DHRII might be considered to be an all-mountain/enduro/downhill tire, it provides a great grip to weight ratio when it's in the 2.3 widths and EXO protection. More: The Best Bike Water Bottle On the Market. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community. JavaScript is disabled. Wouldn't recommend it, basically for the same reason. I would not consider this the typical XC tire unless your typical XC race is the Downieville Classic where 3k feet of climbing is followed by 30mph+ descents. You can already get an Aggressor or Dissector in that weight range. If it wasn't wider than the Forekaster, I'd run it out back. 27.5 x 2.60 Please. The center portion of the tread is also noticeably wider, and there isnt as much of a height difference between in center, intermediate, and outer tread. Fishing 7.75K subscribers Subscribe 13K views 3 years ago Did a quick review of why I like this setup! Maybe a rear tire too. I also never wore out a back tyre after 4 sets of ikons, as they always died when I slashed them. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. Niner Jet 9 RDO, Scalpel 29, XTC 650b, 04 Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Trek Rigid SS - No suspension, no gears.no problem, Stache 29+ - More cushin' for the pushin', This, I Hate the Ardent. She would never say no because of the implication. Tire , Currency: The Forekasters slightly more aggressive tread makes it a slightly more stable design for cornering than the Ardent, though both tire designs handle cornering rather well. That center tread is fantastic for good rolling resistance. I know that Maxx Terra tire wore phenomenally well though compared to the Maxx Speed after almost 400 miles the knobs are still sharp and pronounced and look brand new. We envision the new Forekaster as the perfect companion for long, pedally rides in a variety of terrain. Rim tape and other precautions are optional, though we do recommend using them just to make sure youre getting the absolute most out of your tires, especially since the industry is trending toward more expensive models and high prices even for average tires. I have the now older version and quite happy with it. Maxxis calls it a trail tire on there official website. Maxxis might have some of the most iconic XC/Trail tires like the Ikon and Ardent. Its a fast rolling pattern, thanks to the sloped centre tread, and the side knobs offer good support whilst still retaining enough sensitivity for grip on wet roots thanks to extensive siping. Forekaster being light filled a nice gap. The Maxxis Forekaster is a bit more of a rarity to see, being the go-to Maxxis XC tire for very loose soil or mud. The outer tread tends to pit and show some signs of wear and tear after several months of regular use, especially if you tend to ride harsh surfaces and other difficult terrains. This pretty much looks like a love child of the old Forekaster and the Assegai. As a rear tire, the Ardent has a lot of floats and can be a little drifty, while its more of a speed demon as a front tire. CLP If the girl said no then the answer obviously is no, but she's not gonna say no. It always felt sketchy when really leaned into the corner. 4.23) [Video], CushCore Trail Insert - The Perfect Middle Ground For Tubeless Inserts, Wolf Tooth ReMote Pro - The New & Refined Dropper Remote. The Ardent 2.4 is marketed as a do it all tire with high volume and comes in at 864g. We ran it as a dedicated front. It can find its spot on many bikes front or rear for whatever traction your bike needs. You can choose how much grip you want, how fast the tire rolls, and what wheel you want to put it on with Maxxis. BRL When its really dry and dusty I swap it for a slaughter. Tires are the last place I'd cheap out on, considering they're the only contact you have with the ground. Users are generally very pleased by this tire, especially used in combination with a more aggressive design that offers better grip for added traction and better all-condition performance. When you start reaching those tires limits adjust your air pressure a little. For now, it seems the tires will be offered in 29 only, and have claimed weights of 945g for the 2.4 and 1035g for the 2.6. The forekaster has surprisingly good grip for it's weight, and it performs well in a wide range of conditions (dry loose over hard all the way to slightly greasy clay) but it is no doubt, a reduced rolling resistance xc/trail tire. EUR Well look at where the Ardent stands out, where it falls a little short, and the differences between front and rear mounting this tire. The Maxxis DHRII is the most aggressive tire of this comparison and fits right into and at the top of the trail tire category, going slightly into the all-mountain/enduro tire realm. (New annually renewing membership only. Staff Rides: Mike Kazimer's Coil Shock Trek Fuel EX, First Ride: The New GT Sensor Loses Weight, Gains Travel, Review: TruTune Suspension Inserts Unlock More Travel, Bike Check: Nino Schurter's Custom 10-Time World Champion Scott Spark RC. The Ardent Race sees the same tread pattern as its Trail- and Enduro-oriented siblings, but has had a few millimeters snipped off the tread height all around. The inner tread is relatively short, though still a good bit taller than the tread on a road bike. Would you have this front with a dissector rear? The Minion lasts much longer before starting to lose its superior grip. Installation of the Ardent is a breeze. We have one guy ion our group that tried them on his Ripley and ditched them after 2-3 rides. Aspen in the rear and slightly more tread up front like an Ikon or Ardent Race for dry, Aspen in the rear with a Forekaster up front for loose or wet conditions, Front and rear for fast, predictable handling with matched sizes, Front 2.35 and rear 2.2 for volume to speed, Rear with Ardent or Forekaster for loose or wet conditions. In fact, the Forekaster is going right back on (as a rear) for the summer. Its a trail tyre, through and through, sitting somewhere between the Crossmark and legendary Minion in terms of rolling speed/grip stakes. Video , Currency: AUD My first trail bike came shod in Maxxis Ardent 29x2.25 with no option for tubeless. Fortunately, the sidewalls of the Ardent are strong enough to hold up to a few blowouts if you really want to test the limits of the tread. Most people absolutely do NOT like the Ardent Race as a *front* tire. Originally as OE tyres in 3C trimming and latterly non-3C aftermarket. With seven core tires that we looked at and with all of the tires coming with different widths, casings and rubber options, the possibilities really are endless. Customer Review Intended to be a "Goldilocks" tire, the new Forekaster (released July 2022) rolls faster than a Minion or even the Dissector but provides more predictable cornering, climbing, and braking traction than the Aspen or Rekon. But despite this, their weight is reasonable and their rolling speed remarkable too. Not to be confused with Maxxis Wide Trail tires that are designed around a 30-35mm rim. The launch represents the, Canyon updated the Spectral:ON eMTB in 2022, redesigning the entire bike around their in-house developed batteries. FWIW, Im a big fan of the DHF up front. Its a good option for more aggressive cyclists and those looking to take on the most difficult terrain conditions. CAD Mountain Bike Deals, Copyright 2023 Blue Spruce Ventures LLC | As with the other classic Maxxis tires, the Ardent is available in a huge range of sizes, casings and rubber options, so I will list our more common combinations and sizes that we see. Once leaned over, the slightly offset two rows of side knobs grab and keep your tires planted on the dirt. Honestly, I'd get rid of the Ardent. At 782g, the 27.52.6 is 92g heavier than the 2.35 Forekaster of the same diameter. Would run as a rear though. When I first saw the Rekon, I thought it looked like an XC version of a Maxxis High Roller II and Maxxis Minion combined. 2020 Giant Revolt Advanced 2. However since you already have them: XC, Road, XXC, Endurance, Mtn, All-Mtn, Cross, Gravel, just go have fun on 2 wheels! Where it struggles is in sticky mud as the nobs aren't tall enough. I had a funny feeling that mentioning Ardents would draw some very good responses. With the siped center knobs and the transition blocks creating an aero head, the Ardent Race leans slightly more onto the traction end of Maxxis cross-country tires. I know the 2.25 on my 29er and the 2.4 WT on my 27.5 measured out the same, and the 27.5 was on a rim that was 7mm wider internally. The Forekaster sports shorter medium sized nobs in an open pattern. Its a good combination tire, but most users do note that there are other newer tires in the Maxxis line and others that outperform the Ardent as both a specialist tire and an all-purpose design. Joe will know that I run a pair of old Forekasters in 2.2 flavour on my 100mm-forked 29er XC hardtail. Given their robust almost paddle-style centre tread blocks, the Trail Kings arent sluggish at all, something we can only attribute to the Black Chili compound. :/. Maxxis's latest all-mountain/enduro category offering, the Aggressor, features dual-compound rubber and tubeless-ready construction, measures 2.3 inches wide (for 26, 650b and 29-inch wheels) and is offered in both the EXO and DoubleDown reinforced casings. Well talk about terrain strengths and weaknesses in a separate section, but its worth noting here that this is a good medium between speed and traction. Lightweight. DHRII front with Ikon, Ardent, Ardent Race, Rekon or Ikon in the rear in a smaller size, Padded / Protective Short Liners / Chamois, The Best XC / Trail Tires by Maxxis - Light & Fast (Proven to Make You Faster) [Video], Drilling Holes To Avoid Headset Cable Routing, Brake Pad Compounds & Tons Of New MTB Products Ep. That, in combination with a round profile, make for a lot of traction and predictable cornering behaviour. Continue with Recommended Cookies. They arent completely impervious though, and youll still likely need a patch if you run over the business end of a nail or screw. The Print+ membership where Singletrack magazine drops through your door, plus full digital access, is normally 45, now only 22.50 with the code. Between the center knobs and the side knobs, there are small, square intermediate knobs with alternating slanted siping. Minion DHR II This is a comparison of the Ardent versus some other fast rolling tires, albeit all in a narrower width as this comparison was for XC oriented tires: There was an interview of a Maxxis marketing guy on NSMB, he openly stated that he doesn't like the Ardent at all and there are better options from maxxis that do the same job better (Recon). Aggressor rolls much quicker in the dry/firm, but it is dual vrs 3C too which will have a bearing. When an Aspen in the rear isnt enough (wet Autumn and Winter), I mount an Agressor (god I love this tyre during those months). Terms | Privacy, Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire, Singletracks Mountain Bike News, Product Reviews, MTB Trails and Community. I guess it maybe depends on your type of wet weather. Maxxis DHR II 3C MaxxTerra rear. Weaknesses: A bit vague in intermediate corners. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. All round grip is superb; from hardpack to rubble to mud, the Hans Dampf is versatile like few other treads weve ever used. The Ardent is just a touch thicker than the Ikon, 2.4 compared to 2.2. No thanks. Ardent 2.4 in front. Looks like Ill be looking towards their more XC-orientated models next time, which is a shame as I like the larger side knobles than is typical for a light tyre. You mentioned that youre not looking at the 2.6 versions, but hopefully this is helpful. Ive found myself in some sketchy situations when its slipped out on me in flat turns. Shame theyre quoting them as so heavy, the 292.4 is claimed at 945g, which puts it same weight as a Dissector and 2.3 DHR II. Spied these on Geoff Kabushs instagram a few weeks back, think I need some of these! Then again, what I know about XC tyres aint a lot. The Aspen has some small race size ramped knobs in the center with larger more aggressive side knobs. Still feels like it rolls pretty good even mounted reversed. Manage Settings Durable compounds. USD This would be great of pair with a dissector upfront or a minion. Never again! VerticalScope Inc., 111 Peter Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. With 90 kilos on the seat. Earlier this year, the 2.6 Maxxis Forekaster won me over for its proficient, playful, and predictable mannerisms. I personally really like to ride this tire out back, be it a 2.2 or 2.35. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Thick branches can be a similar problem if your tire hits them pointy-end first. Use as a front paired with an Aspen or Ikon rear for an "aggressive" XC setup. The Ardent is decent as a rear tire, but to echo what many others have already posted, I would definitely not run them as a front tire. The Rekon Tire might be the most under the radar as its a new tire packed with some really awesome features. For example, when I started riding in Colorado I was happy with a Ground Control front and a Fast Trak rear but I was also slooow. A nippy tyre for modest trail bikes. Dual compound or 3C MaxxTerra options EXO sidewall protection Tubeless Ready (TR) Bicycle technology Category: XC, Trail In light loose soil, its nicely responsive and stable. I have been a writer for nigh on 20 years, a photographer for 25 years and a mountain biker for 30 years. The rest of tyre tread, from its general knob height and Nobby Nic-esque tread pattern, seems to my eyes to be much more of the sort of thing Id worry less about having on my bike as I headed into some wet muck. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. New to the Maxxis mountain bike tire lineup a couple of years ago, the Aggressor has quickly become a go-to rear tire choice for a lot of riders. If your your rims are inner width i25mm or wider (which is how most XC bikes come these days), you might consider a 2.6in tire like the Maxxis Rekon. Single or dual compound options 60 TPI casing Available with EXO sidewall protection Select specs are Tubeless Ready (TR), confirm in table below Category: Trail The Dissector is Maxxis' answer to consumers' desire for an all-around mountain bike tire, and given the fact that Aussie downhill pro Troy Brosnan was influential in its development, its versatility was baked in from the start. I am going to give it a try. Got a bargain Forekaster/Reckon (front/rear) 2nd hand from a lad who took them unused off his oEM Orbea- delighted to have them and only 40 quid or so. The difference is this tire doesn't blow out sidewalls like the NN. Plus, well cover some of what you can expect once youre actually out on the trail. But if this is more durable then it might be worth the extra weight. That said, if you already have the appropriate tools and a pneumatic pump on hand, theres no reason no to speed the whole process up. The 29er version with the durable DoubleDown casing we tested weighed 1,090 grams. 2.3 DHR2 3C and 2.3 Aggressor dual are my two main rear tyres. Like mine, Ardent 2.4 front, prefer Ardent Race 2.2 to normal Ardent at the rear, both tubeless on the original flow rims. Strengths: Fastest rolling of this bunch. The Maxxis Ardent is a light duty trail tire that rolls fast in dry conditions. Cotic RocketMAXer. This property in a tyre can often result from a softer, faster wearing compound not so with the XR4s. That said, the tread is only moderately aggressive, and it looks like less of an all-terrain all-condition tire than many of its competitors. Maxxis Crossmark II EXO TR 29 x 2.25in performance. For the rear, I opted for something a little lighter that I thought might be more likely to give it up in fast tight turns. I thought the old Forekaster was ok for what it was. I ride 2.6 front & 2.35 rear while he rides 2.2s. Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, trails, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more! The side nobs are not as aggressive as those on the Ardent. Prices start from 59.99 RRP. Strengths: Meaty, moto-style tread digs into loose surfaces. I rode Ikons front and back on my 29er XC hardtail in 2.0 width for a while, but after a bit I started noticing the front was washing out more than I'd like. Drop questions if you have any. I run the current Forekaster and it does get sketchy when put a few miles on it. I am currently riding on Maxxis Ikon 292.35 front and rear on my full suspension cross country bike. The harder-wearing PaceStar compound is recommended for the rear or youll be shelling out for new rubber very quickly. Best MTB Gear | Ragley Big Wig, Surly Cross Check (gravel bike), Sunday Soundwave (BMX), 91 Schwinn High Plain (about town bike), Nashbar CXSS (on trainer). But while the Ardent is dual-compound rubber in the center tread, the Forekaster is dual compound throughout. For fast hardpack punctuated by loose, dry sections, the Dissector has few equals. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. The extra width and volume over the old 2.25 Ardent really made this tire shine on the trail. It also happens to be pretty light for the amount of traction it provides, which I don't think anyone will complain about. However, the thinner design of the Ikon combines with a less aggressive tread style to create a much looser grip. The Forekaster sports shorter medium sized nobs in an open pattern. Bikerumor Copyright 2013 2023. However, the tread is significantly thicker on the Minion, which is what gives it better loose soil traction. With more intermediate knobs than the Ardent tire, the Ardent Race looks more like an aggressive Ikon tire. Support Us | The center tread is ramped but tightly packed to roll fast with side knobs that have an alternating stepped pattern to them. A lot of people are running Dissectors up front on downcountry / short travel bikes, myself included. What they really didnt have was something like this, funnily enough. I have since gone to a 2.4 bontrager xr4 as a front tire over the forekaster. I will start with the faster rolling, smaller tread tires and continue into the heavier, knobbier tires that tend to have more traction. The 2.25 width option is a great aggressive XC tire, and like the Rekon, the Ardent in a 2.4 width fits right into that trail category. In some pics the knobs look shallow, in other pics they look a bit taller. I have a buddy that runs the Forkaster front & rear on his Primer raves about them. With the Protection reinforced sidewalls the casing is very tough and while the lovely logos of our test tyres are pretty scuffed up, we havent experienced any sidewall cuts or tears. I'd say try both and see which one you like for where and how you ride. As Maxxis puts it, When an Aspen isnt enough tire but a Minion is too much, choose the new Maxxis Forekaster.. Having mid-height almost square knobs across the tire that is spaced out quite a bit, it's as close to an XC spike you can get. Dual compound or 3C MaxxSpeed options 60 TPI or 120 TPI casing options EXO sidewall protection Two thumbs up. 3C is a good addition but I really dont want a tyre just shy of 1kg for my riding. The Ardent, however, covers that vast middle ground and covers it damn well. I'd do Ardent in front and Forekaster rear. Two different rubber compounds will be offered with Dual or 3C MAxxTerra, and all models will have EXO sidewall protection and Tubeless Ready Casings. Anything more and that goes into the next category of tires. Contis Black Chili compound seems to improve with use. Strengths: Huge volume at a reasonable weight. 2022 Knolly Fugitive 138. I could try it out and see. The DHRII has large ramped knobs in the center that take up most of the tread, and then transition to classic Minion side knobs. Still, its always good to chat rubber init. Maxxis Ardent, Bontrager XR4, Continental Trail King and Schwalbe Hans Dampf. Prior to that, Zach spent many years in the back of a bicycle shop building and repairing nearly every type of bike, while figuring out how to (occasionally) ride them. BRL Frankly, I'm too scared (read: lack the skill) to ride those. Im sure the DHF is a great tire, but it would be overkill for my riding tread-wise and weight-wise. Just installed an Ardent Race 2.35 on the front. Pairing a slightly meatier tire up front with a faster rolling tire out back is normally how we roll with our XC-ish, light-trail setups, which some might describe as "down-county" bikes. The new Forekaster has morphed into something new, and while it may no longer really be an XC tire, it's now an excellent all-round trail tire. An Aspen is never enough in the front, and if it is, then you should be riding a gravel bike. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. A forum community dedicated to Mountain Bike owners and enthusiasts. That's changed a bit with the new version. I have written countless magazine and website features and route guides for the UK mountain bike press, most notably for the esteemed and highly regarded Singletrackworld. If at all possible I avoid riding when it is wet and most of the trails where I ride are loose over hard with lots of roots and the occasional rock garden. If that doesnt work try the next tire in your favorite manufacturers line. Billed as a Jack of all trades tread, wed have to agree that this is some of the best all rounder rubber available and weve used these tyres on multiple bikes now. The Ardent Race is the faster, smaller knobbed brother of the classic Ardent tire. It also makes a great rear tire when looking for speed in the back and some more tread up front like what you would get with the Ardent, Ardent Race or Forekaster. The Maxxis Ikon tire might be the most classic XC tire in most recent years and is still winning WC XC races. CAD Was hoping it would be closer to 850g but still very keen to give them a go! Was it an Ardent 2.4 width that let go on you? Off to buy one before they are out of stock! I have the 2.4 Ardent on the front of my Yeti SB5 and Intense Primer. After pouring through their catalog comparing tread designs and weights, I settled on a Forekaster and Ardent. Review | Dynaplug tubeless repair tools continue to set the gold standard, Continental Tyre Review | Argotal, Kryptotal & Xynotal Tyres, Trek Fuel EX 2023 Review | A bigger, musclier & hugely adaptable trail bike, Specialized Stumpjumper Mullet Review | The Stumpy gets a bigger fork & mixed wheels, This website requires Javascript for optimum viewing purposes. What more could you want? Use code HELLO54 when you join us as a print or digital member and your membership will be half price for the first year. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Ardent Race Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total). The intermediate zone, between upright and full leant over, is a little vague the knobs in this space are sparse and fairly flexible. Ardent tires are also relatively puncture-resistant, and unlikely to give way even on cheese grater rocks and other difficult terrain. Continue with Recommended Cookies. I switched that out to a 2.35 Forekaster and it has been on there ever since. I was initially running a 2.35 Ikon on the back and while it has a surprising amount of grip, in the fall with the leaves on the ground, I found it lacking in traction when crawling up steep climbs and in the corners. The new Forekaster has certainly got closer spaced knobs but thats about the only thing theoretically less-wet-friendly about it. It was an immediate improvement from the Ikon and it's been there for a year.

Https Vns Ep Prismhr Com Auth Login, West Ada School District Boundaries, Jerry Daniels Obituary, Articles M